beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.14 2017가단5147446

구상금

Text

1. As to KRW 22,386,755 and KRW 7,342,175 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 15,04,580 from June 2, 2017.

Reasons

(b) The mark; and

(1) The signs of broken-down vehicles under Article 66 of the former Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs No. 121, Jun. 2, 2017) shall be installed and shall take necessary measures, such as moving-off of the vehicle to a place other than an expressway, etc.

1. The standards shall be the same as the Korean Industrial Standards (KS) R 5050 referred to in Article 10 of the Industrial Standardization Act;

2.*The term "*" is a mold in which reflectors are affixed, and the part not more than 5§® is the same as a square sign body shall be regarded as part of the square light sign body.

3. In cases where a mold is used to attach reflectors, she shall have 6 mm or more in radius at the apex of 3 apex of the outer mold;

B) In full view of the description of evidence Nos. 6-4 through 9-9, some entry of evidence No. 6-5, and Gap evidence No. 6-10, the overall purport of the pleadings, there is no reflective evidence. (1) C used power power where the engine stops due to the power of the Defendant’s vehicle’s darbing off from the side to the two-lanes, and stops the said vehicle over one wheel width from the side to the two-lanes, and (2) C opened the stop to the minor letter. (2) immediately after the stopping of the Defendant’s emergency vehicle, she moved from the driver’s seat to approximately 126 meters away from the driver’s seat, and led the Defendant to walk by sending a dangerous signal to the latter driving vehicle with the handlight, etc. (3) but 3).