2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

On September 6, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months at the Changwon District Court for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 14th of the same month.

The Defendant, as a passbook of the village B located in the Changwon-si, in the same Gu where the Defendant was living in the vicinity of the Defendant’s residence, went through the “D Apartment Construction Corporation”, and was asked to the EEE Construction Corporation for the operation right, etc. of the construction site, which was demanded by the EE EE Construction Corporation to compensate for noise and dust damage caused by the construction, but was rejected, the Defendant attempted to interfere with the construction by mobilization of the village residents.

Accordingly, from May 8, 2012 to 15:00 on the same day, the Defendant mobilized the aged female female at the crosswalk at the entrance of the entrance road to the above construction site from around 14:00 to around 15:00 on the same day, and provided that, without mentioning the purpose of the assembly or the terms and conditions of the demand for compensation, the Defendant merely interfered with the Defendant’s entry of the above truck by having residents E of village (the age of 76), F (the age of 76), etc. enter the above construction site in front of the river project, such as Gump trucks, etc., affiliated with the victim recognized Saturdays Co., Ltd., Ltd., who was awarded a subcontract for the civil works of the above construction site, without mentioning the purpose of the assembly or the conditions of the demand for compensation.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the public works of the victim company by force.

Defendant including this, and the same month

9. From 14:00 to 15:00 of the same month, on the 11st of the same month, 09:0 to 16:00 of the same month, on the 17th of the same month, 09:0 to 16:00 of the same month, and on the 18th of the same month, at the same place as in the same manner, the victim interfered with the construction work of the victim company by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of a police officer in relation to F, H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, and E;

1. P, Q, R, S, T.