When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 13, 2016, around 00:50, the Defendant stolen a b7,500 won of the market price in the knife knife warehouse operated by the victim C, which was operated by the victim C, from the Government-si on June 13, 2016

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant’s legal statement

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as data on the date of the E’s written statement, data on (CCTV) and data on the transfer generation;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In addition, even though the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had been sentenced to punishment for the same kind of crime.

However, the defendant recognized his mistake and reflected his mistake.

The extent of damage is minor and the victim does not want to be punished by the agreement.

In addition, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of various sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.