2. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the victim, as an employee of the telecom, went into the telecom with the defendant after obtaining a visit from D with the defendant and going into the telecom.

As such, the above act of the injured party cannot be seen as an unfair infringement against the defendant.

In addition, it can not be said that the defendant's act of cutting down the victim's timber and cutting over the floor by breathing the breath can not be said to be reasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.