특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BM5 car.
On September 6, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on September 19:34, and driven the two-laned road in front of D in E in E in Erified City, along one lane, driven from the intersection of Eldo to E in the speed of about 60km.
At the time, the Defendant tried to change the lane from the first lane to the second lane, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to take a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle into account the front and rear left well and accurately manipulate the steering gear and prevent the accident in advance.
Nevertheless, while neglecting this, the Defendant neglected to drive the vehicle due to the sudden change of the vehicle line, the victim G (the age of 31) who has driven a FF mixed, pcx125 motorcycle in two lanes after the Defendant driven the vehicle due to the sudden change of the vehicle, found the vehicle of the Defendant in the course of the rapid operation of the vehicle in order to prevent the collision with the Defendant, has lost balance and exceeded the road.
As a result, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in light of the trend that requires medical treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as cutting down the same mixed pcx125 motor bicycle to the extent that 1,389,468 won, such as Bracker exchange, repair expenses, etc., such as Brackers exchange, was damaged, and then the Defendant escaped.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. The police’s written statement of the statement of the witness G and H concerning G’s written statement of the written statement of the statement of the statement of the witness G and H [the defendant and his defense counsel did not agree to use the traffic accident report (Evidence No. 1) and the report on the occurrence of the traffic accident (Evidence No. 2) as evidence, and the police officer I and the J present at the trial or the preparatory hearing of the instant case and recognized the authenticity of each of the above evidences.