A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendants and D’s special thief Defendants, along with D, came to be the 1st bicycle storage unit at around 20:05, Apr. 28, 2013, at around 2013, at the same time at the same time, G, one of which is the victim E owned by the victim E, who was parked there, and the F, F,50,000 won at the market price of 3,50,000, which was parked at the same place, Defendant A driven by Defendant A, and Defendant B moved to the G truck, and Defendant B led one bicycle, which was corrected in the 2nd bicycle storage unit for which the owner of the apartment cannot be identified, and loaded into the said truck and loaded it into the said truck.

As a result, the Defendants and D stolen the victims' property jointly.

2. On April 28, 2013, Defendant A’s violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driven the said G truck without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of about 30km from around the same day, around 21:00 on the same day via the day from around 21:0 to the day from around 30km to the above corporation I.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. E statements;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Statement of reasons for disqualification;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (on-site photographs and CCTV photographs);

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of special larceny), Article 152 Subparag. 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (the occupation of driving without a license and the choice of imprisonment);

B. Defendant B: Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of special larceny)

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., when committing a crime; (ii) the total amount of theft is not excessive; and (iii) the defendants have no other criminal records in Korea; and (iv) the circumstances favorable to the extent that the defendants have no other criminal records in Korea;

1. It shall be decided as per the Disposition for the reason that Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the same favorable circumstances as the above has been repeated) of the suspended execution is more than the same;