When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around November 21, 2017, “D” located near Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment complex shall interfere with the business of a person under the influence of alcohol.

“The police officer’s lawful execution of duties concerning the mobilization of a report 112 report was obstructed by assaulting F, who was sent to F, who was urged to return home from F by the chief F of the police box affiliated with the Seoul Western Police Station Emba, and was f, who was boomed by the two descendants, and was boomed by three times his chest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (the analysis of video files filed by police officers with H);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant appears to have committed a crime by confessioning the facts of the crime; (b) there is no serious criminal record exceeding the same kind or fine; (c) the degree of assault is not excessive; and (d) other circumstances revealed in the records and arguments of this case, a punishment shall be determined as ordered by the Disposition, taking into account the following circumstances.