If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Defendant

B, A is a simple penalty, and the victim C is a police officer.

Defendant

B around 23:45 on October 2013, 2013, at the time of Silung City, the victim Haba, who was under the command of the assault report case in the front of D on the street, sent to the scene, expressed that “I would like to be fluored if I would like to fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor fluor, fluor, fluor fluor, fluor fluor, fluor, fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor f.”

Accordingly, the Defendants interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the F Statements;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.