A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the above defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Defendants are their children, and C is attending the E-care center located in Nam-gu, Busan as his father and wife.

1. On June 25, 2014, Defendant B heard that C was the victim F (n, 26 years of age), a child-care center teacher, Defendant B’s child-care center teacher, and Defendant B made a public insultd the victim by making a large voice that “I am for any year? I am for a certain year? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am we am? I am we am? I am we am we am? I am am we am we am we am we am. I am am we am we am. I am am you am. I am you will am am you am

2. Defendant A: (a) around 10:30 on June 28, 2014, around 10:30, at the day of the above child care center, Defendant A, who was kneeing in front of the Defendant, sounded that “I am knee in the face kne? I am knee? I am knee in the face kne? I am knee in the victim’s off kne, so I am the victim’s off kne part of the victim’s off kneke, and am the victim’s right shoulder kne,

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement made by the Defendants in this Act

1. Entry of each statement in the F and G prepared by the police;

1. Statement in a complaint prepared by the F;

1. Investigative report (including attachment photographs and CDs) and images (including attachment photographs and CDs) prepared by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes written in a written diagnosis of injury to F prepared by a doctor H;

1. Article 311 (Selection of Fine) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 (Selection of Fine): Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Sentence B of the suspended sentence: Fines of 500,000 won;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Defendant B of suspended sentence: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the “instant crime”) was promoted to the effect that one’s assistance aircraft was against the victim, and thus, the instant crime was prevented, and there was no previous conviction.