2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On November 3, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract for the said land with Nonparty B, who was cultivated by the Defendant in 1997, after lending the land of 2,561 square meters (hereinafter “instant land before the instant partition”) from the Defendant, which is a state-owned land on November 3, 2014. The Korea Asset Management Corporation is the land management authority, and the Defendant is the owner of the instant land.

B. As to the land before the instant division on November 4, 2014, the Korea Asset Management Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”) refers to the Korea Asset Management Corporation’s regional headquarters in Gwangju Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the “Management Corporation”).

A) The Defendant filed an application for the approval of sale with the authority to sell the remaining 2,398 square meters, excluding 163 square meters which cannot be sold, as it constitutes an urban planning facility (road). On January 2, 2015, the Defendant notified B of the fact that the sale of the land was approved and the payment of the fees for the partition survey. 2) The Defendant divided the land before the instant partition into 2,398 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and 163 square meters in accordance with the payment of the fees for the partition survey under the foregoing B, and then sold the instant divided land to B in the amount of KRW 1,473,571,00,00.

3) On February 26, 2015, the Defendant notified B of the fact that the sale of the instant land was approved, and thus, notified B of the implementation of the procedures for concluding the sales contract, the Defendant sent “the procedures for concluding the State-owned property sales contract” to the effect that both the remainder of KRW 147,357,100 for the contract deposit and the remainder of KRW 1,326,213,90 for the transfer of ownership would deliver the documents for the transfer of ownership, as listed in the following table 1; however, on April 22, 2015, the Defendant sent again the “the guidance for the procedures for concluding the State-owned property sales contract,” the land size of which was modified to 2,561 square meters, on the ground that the said guidance was erroneous in indicating the land size as 2,398 square meters. The guidance for the procedures for concluding the sales