On January 3, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim T at the S cafeteria located in Singu, Singu, I that it is necessary to conduct construction works for the creation of a factory site and obtain a loan to a new cooperation as security, and therefore, it is necessary to pay appraisal fees. Therefore, the household check will be repaid by the due date.”

However, in fact, it was thought that it will be used for personal debt repayment by receiving the check from the victim, there was no think that it will be used as appraisal fee in relation to the construction of the building site of the chemical factory in emulcation, and even if it was delivered the check because it was not in cash, there was no intention or ability to pay the check until March 27, 2013, and April 3, 2013.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received from the victim one copy of “U” and “V” as appraisal fee, and acquired from the victim, i.e., five million won household checks as appraisal fee.

Summary of Evidence

1. T legal statement of the witness;

1. Application of a copy of household check Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Imprisonment with prison labor chosen;