On June 29, 2012, the Defendant: (a) found the victim D(25 years of age) to the above location of the victim on the ground that the victim was not a good horse with respect to the Defendant; (b) found the victim’s cell phone at the above location; (c) destroyed the victim’s cell phone at one million won in the market price, which is the victim’s possession by cutting off the cell phone from the victim’s cell phone; and (d) sold the victim’s seat to the left seat at several times with the victim’s back to the back of the PC; (c) led the victim’s body from the back of the two arms to the direction outside of the PC; and (d) caused the victim to have his head to be fright down, leaving the victim to be fright down; and (d) caused the victim to fright up the body of the victim; (d) caused the victim to galle the body of the victim to be imp from the head to the lower part; and (e) caused inside the mouth and the mouth of the body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. Reports on internal investigation (general-Dong situations, etc. at the time of withdrawal);

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (ctv analysis reports at the scene of crime);

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 2 and Article 60(1) of the Juvenile Act or above.