However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 13, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime around September 13, 2013, around 18:00, at the home of the Defendant, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, 119 Dong 1301, and at the home of the Defendant, a dispute was brought about due to the victim D (Woo, 41 years old) who is his spouse, and living expenses, and boomed the victim's neck with his hand, and went beyond the victim's body, and led the victim to light divers for three weeks of medical treatment.

[In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined in this court, the above facts constituting the crime are sufficiently recognized. The defendant also recognized the fact that he had been fighting with the victim during the time of the crime. The victim visited the above hospital at the same time and received medical treatment for salvinal sal, etc., and was diagnosed by his intention on the same day, and on the same day, received the above injury. The above written diagnosis of injury states that “the victim was salving and salving the victim.” However, considering the circumstance that the victim did not take measures such as reporting the defendant to the police at the time, it is difficult to view that the victim’s above statement made to the doctor at the time of the above medical examination and the injury diagnosis was a false statement to mislead the defendant. Moreover, the photograph taken by the victim at the time corresponds to the above injury part 2-A. Although other evidence revealed in light of the fact of the crime committed by the victim, it is difficult to deny this part of the defendant’s statement about the crime as it is.

2. Crimes committed on June 30, 2016;

A. On June 30, 2016, the injured Defendant: (a) at the Defendant’s home in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, 22:40 on June 30, 2016, said Defendant had a dispute with his or her children going from a private teaching institute; (b) and (c) was said victim’s “Any reason why he or she did not go against, but d