교통사고처리특례법위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 10, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court, and on August 19, 2014, for a fine of KRW 7 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seo branch court of the Daegu District Court. < Amended by Act No. 1284, Aug. 19, 2014>
On November 3, 2014, at around 19:12, the Defendant driven CK5 car while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.065% without obtaining a driver’s license, from the front of the outer workplace located in the Jinju-gun of Seongbuk-do to the front of the entrance of the Korean chemical located in the same water village through the outside of the same surface of the road.
2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a CK5 vehicle.
On November 3, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of 0.065% of alcohol concentration without obtaining a driver’s license on November 3, 2014, and driven the said car at a speed of 0.065%, and driven the road at a speed of about 40 km from the direction of Kimcheon-si to the direction of the wall of the Sincheon-si.
At the time, there were pedestrians who walk the front side and walk the front side, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so, and neglected to do so, received the part of the victim D (e.g., 54 years old) who walked on the wall side from Kimcheon-si to the front right side of the vehicle of the Defendant.
After all, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the above occupational negligence, around 19:40 on the same day, in the brain ties, multiplestrokes.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;