If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

On June 23, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the said victim J on the first floor coffee shop of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stating that “In SH Corporation, the said victim J recons itself and has a legal complex. To those who engage in farming by leasing the greenhouse houses, etc. for the purpose of growing facilities from the original residents, five square meters per five square meters per greenhouse at the compensation vehicle for those who engage in farming at the same time. The inside of the Republic of Korea has two copies of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the b

However, in fact, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Seoul Songpa-gu M/N, which was owned by the Defendant, was the breabbbing area of the Seoul Songpa-gu, and the breabing area of the livestock industry facilities that did not compensate for the breabing area, and thus, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to allow the victim to obtain the substitute soil even if he sells the two copies of the b

Around June 24, 2011, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the money from the victim to the foreign exchange bank account in the name of the Defendant, from the victim, and acquired the money by deceiving KRW 10 million out of the purchase price in Chapter 2 of the relevant Dob Protection Area.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statements made by witnesses J andO in the second trial records;

1. Each legal statement of witness P and Q in each part;

1. Some statements made by the prosecution against the accused in the suspect examination protocol (including J andO substitute parts);

1. A copy of the police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on details of passbook transactions;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at the early April 2010 office, operated by the Defendant on the five floors of Songpa-gu Seoul Ro Building on the fifth floor, the victim J of the land at a successful bid.