장해등급 결정처분 취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On April 23, 2015, the Plaintiff provided medical treatment to the Defendant for disability benefits due to occupational accidents, such as “the thirrosis and part of the thirropical pulverization of superior executives, the thropical thropical loss and the thropical thirropical damage and the thropical tyrosis, the thropical thropical thropical thropical strest, the thropical thropical thropical strest, the thropical thropical thropical stirr, the thropical thropical throph
B. On January 24, 2017, the Defendant determined the Plaintiff’s disability grade to Class 8 for the following reasons (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
The left-hand bridge: the right-hand fall under Class 9 (Determination of Applicable Mutatis Mutandis): Class 10 of Class 12 (Persons who are disabled in the function of one pipe among the three sections of the first bridge - Persons who need not install a fixed gear in ordinary labor but who severely have a serious trouble in the function of one pipe among the three sections of the first bridge ): Class 14 (Persons who have a serious trouble in the function of one pipe among the three sections of the third bridge ) of Class 10: the function or mental function of the psychological system of Class 11 of Grade 13 (Second, those who have failed to properly use the fall): the final rating of Class 8 (Persons who remain in the part of the national part of the national part of the bridge ): the final rating of Class 8 of Grade 14 (Persons who have a serious trouble in the function of one pipe among the three sections of the first bridge ):
C. The Plaintiff filed a petition for review against the Defendant, but was dismissed on April 28, 2017.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 and 3 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the plaintiff could not properly dively strings on both sides due to the dynamics (14.7m of the front left side, 27.5m of the left side 27.5mm of the front left side) of the snives of both sides, and therefore the defendant should have a disability corresponding to class 8 on the right snives and the left side snives, but the defendant does not recognize an obstacle to the right snives, and falls under class 12 on the left side snives.