If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person engaging in driving a PP car.

On May 10, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car at around 00:05, and proceeded two lanes in front of the U.S. Don-dong U.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.S.S. S.S.A.S.S.S. S

In such cases, the defendant had a duty of care to check and drive the safety of the career and the safety of the career.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded as it was due to the negligence in front of the driver’s seat of the said vehicle, and received the D Launta string part of the said vehicle, which was parked in one-lane in the same direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not take necessary measures, such as immediately checking damage caused by occupational negligence, even though the Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle with a repair cost of KRW 50,000, and caused obstacles to the prevention of traffic hazards and obstacles and ensuring safe and smooth transportation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents, reports on driving of drivers, and actual status survey reports;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning the facts of crime, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that choose the penalty, Articles 148 and 54 (2) 2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (2) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;