물품대금
The defendant shall pay 79,973,676 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from February 11, 2014 to the day of complete payment.
In full view of the facts that there is no dispute over the cause of the claim, and the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, the plaintiff supplied the defendant with red ginseng extraction and storage lines facilities (hereinafter "facilities of this case") at around March 2013, the plaintiff supplied the defendant with red ginseng extraction and storage lines facilities (hereinafter "facilities of this case") at least 63,560,000 won, and supply back and around December 9, 2013, the balance of the outstanding amount of KRW 79,973,767 in total is as shown in the separate sheet No. 4 of the transaction partner (Evidence No. 4).
This reflects the repayment of KRW 2,800,000 on August 21, 2013, as claimed by the Defendant.
Since the defendant is able to recognize the fact, the defendant is obligated to pay the above amount and the amount to the plaintiff at a rate of 20% per annum from the next day after the delivery of a copy of the complaint sought by the plaintiff to the plaintiff.
The Defendant’s assertion regarding the Defendant’s assertion is KRW 70,00,000. The Plaintiff received KRW 170,000,000 from a corporate bank and returned KRW 10,000,000 among them to the Defendant’s side, and eventually, the Plaintiff paid KRW 70,000,000 ( KRW 170,000-10,000) to the Defendant’s side. In short, the Plaintiff’s obligation to pay to the Plaintiff is merely KRW 15,11,276,00,00,00.
Judgment
According to the statements in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2-1 and 1-2, the plaintiff paid KRW 170,000,000 to the plaintiff from a corporate bank on March 13, 2013, and on the same day, the plaintiff paid KRW 100,000,000 to the defendant's personal account of joint representative director C. However, in full view of the purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 2 and 5, the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to prepare a false commodity supply contract with the amount of KRW 350,00,000 for the purpose of obtaining facility loan, and to compensate the amount of taxes therefrom to the plaintiff on March 13, 2013 based on the above commodity supply contract.