However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 17, 2013, at around 13:00, the Defendant driven C concrete mixture truck, and straighted the starting distance intersection in the calculation of the Jeonnam-Seoul-Eup, from the complex cargo terminal room to the open-distance of the same Eup/Myeon. In violation of the signal, the Defendant suffered injury, such as cutting back woms, etc. of the victim D (74 years old) driving, which proceeded on the right side from the left side of the progress direction due to the occupational negligence in violation of the signal, due to the shock of the victim’s e-packer, who proceeded to the right side from the running direction of the truck driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A medical certificate (D);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the traffic accident scene photographs and the actual survey report;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, including the following: (a) the nature and circumstances of the defendant's crime cannot be deemed to be light; (b) the fact that the defendant has committed a crime;

1. An order to provide community service or attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;