손해배상(자)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 46,80,690 for the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s annual rate from September 6, 2009 to December 18, 2013, and the following.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. 1) B is based on the basis of liability, around 13:18 September 6, 2009, CMaz Passenger Vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicles”).
2) On the other hand, while driving the vehicle and driving the vehicle, and driving the vehicle, and driving the vehicle from Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, a one-lane back from the 27-128 International Casphere in front of the International Casphere in the coast box to the front of the International Casphere of the International Casphere of the International Casphere at the coast guard station, it was negligent in checking and driving the career safety by reducing speed and taking well-being the rear side of the vehicle in the same direction, and caused the Plaintiff to suffer injury, such as an injury, such as the escape certificate of a conical signboard between the drilling No. 5-2 No. 1 in the 1 in the 1st century (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”).
(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages sustained by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.
C. The limitation of liability: (a) the Plaintiff did not distinguish the vehicular road from the vehicular road and delivery, and talked with two walking along the road in which the passage of the vehicle is frequent, without having to live well around the road; and (b) such error appears to have caused the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damage; (c) the external wound of the instant accident on the post-pactical signboard escape certificate No. 5-300,000, the external wound of the instant accident is about 25%; (c) the Plaintiff’s multiple confluence symptoms were diagnosed with the symptoms of spreading the prone of the left-hand fluoral power generation; and (d) the Plaintiff has already been diagnosed with the symptoms of spreading the confluence to the left-hand fluoral power generation; and (e) the Plaintiff has received treatment from November 2, 2004 to December 3, 204, and there is no physical symptoms of the confluence.