When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who operates a telecom and a fishery products wholesale and retail company with the trade name of “D” in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

No credit card merchant shall make a transaction by credit cards in the name of another credit card merchant.

Nevertheless, around 03:37 on August 12, 2013, the Defendant, while operating the said D trading, traded 40,000 won by using the name of another credit card merchant in the name of another credit card merchant, while settling 40,000 won from bad customers, as well as trading in the name of another credit card merchant. From around that time to December 31, 2014, the Defendant traded 167,589,000 won in total by using the name of another credit card merchant in the name of another credit card merchant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Report of investigation (Adjustment of list of crimes);

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to certificates, sight cards, and copies of written certifications;

1. Relevant Article of facts constituting an offense and Articles 70(2)3 and 19(4)3 of the former Specialized Credit Finance Business Act (Amended by Act No. 13068, Jan. 20, 2015);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.