However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 00:00 on September 30, 2014, the Defendant ordered a beer, etc. with no money, and received services, etc. equivalent to a total of 2.40,000 won at the market price from the victim E, and then received a request from the victim for the payment of the price, the Defendant: (a) was able to receive the money from the victim; (b) he was able to receive the money from the victim; (c) he was able to receive the money from the victim; (d) he was able to receive the money from the weak; and (e) he was able to receive the money from the weak; and (e) he was able to receive the money from the weak; and (e) he was able to receive the money from the victim by making a request for the payment of the money for about 40 minutes, such as making it possible for the victim to receive the money from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property benefits by threatening the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 350 (1) of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, Etc., and all the conditions of sentencing, including the following factors: (a) the punishment of multiple times (2006, 2008, 2008, etc.) and the punishment of a fine (2007, 1, 2007, 2007, 2014, 200, 2014, 200, 200) are considered: (a) the method of punishment, inferiorness, reflectivity