beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.08.16 2018가단52158

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 29, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) driven a bicycle at around 07:10, while driving a bicycle at around 07:0,00, the G Tri-range in front of the Sinsan City F was straighted from the gym-distance away from the gym-distance away from the gym-distance away; (b) the Defendant driving a Hpo-freight to turn to the left from the i apartment room, which is the right right side of the Plaintiff’s running direction; (c) during that process, the left side of the vehicle loaded on the said cargo and the front

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

According to CCTV images taken by the instant accident point, at least one minute of the numberless vehicles were left left the door of the playground distance after the waiting signal at the Defendant’s moving direction, and the instant accident occurred after 25 seconds thereafter.

After the occurrence of the accident of this case 16 seconds, other vehicles began from the view of the sports field shooting distance from the view of the 30th radio distance.

(The plaintiff also confirmed the above facts at the time of the police investigation on July 2, 2017). According to the current organization information chart at the intersection of the accident point of this case, green signal 33 seconds and yellow signal 3 seconds from the defendant's right side.

C. On July 2, 2017, the Plaintiff was investigated by the Transport Survey Team of the Military Police Station in relation to the instant accident. At the first time, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant violated the signal at the time. However, the CCTV images taken the instant accident point were reported, and confirmed the organization information chart at the intersection, and acknowledged the Plaintiff’s violation of the signal.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 6, 11, 13, 14, Eul evidence No. 1 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident occurred due to the Defendant’s violation of signal and speed, and the violation of duty of Jeonju. The Plaintiff suffered injury to the Defendant, such as the left hand, the left part, the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the case.