However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant was an employee of the service business company C, which is located in Gyeyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B, in charge of bid for apartment guard in the above company.

On March 9, 2015, the Defendant, at around 17:00 on March 17, 2015, in relation to the bid for the security service company for D apartment units at the office of the above company, deemed that it would be more favorable for the said company to report the vehicle to be used by the patrol vehicle as a vehicle owned by the above company, not a leased vehicle, and that the said company used the vehicle as a lease agreement.

In order to forge a registration certificate of the E-learning passenger car, the E-learning passenger car was born.

Accordingly, the Defendant, at around that time by using a computer of the company’s office, cans the above vehicle registration certificate using a computer, and then entered it as “C” in the column for ownership of the above registration certificate using the computer program, and entered “F” in the column for the registration number of the corporation in the column for the registration number of the corporation, and forged the registration certificate in the name of the Jeju apartment management office, which is an official document for rights and duties, for the purpose of printing and exercising it, and submitted to the said management office, at around March 10, 2015, a tender document for a guard company at the Suwon-gu D Apartment Complex Management Office of Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which is a forged official document, and submitted it to the employees in charge of the said management office without knowledge of the fact that the registration certificate of the E-learning vehicle, which is a forged official document, was used.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a document introduced and submitted by C Company, a written application for participation in bidding, and a copy of a forged motor vehicle registration certificate;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 25 of the Official Document) and Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of uttering of forged official document);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: