Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

On May 29, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) at the Daegu High Court on one year and six months, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 6, 2014.

On March 6, 2014, around 10:10 on March 6, 2014, the Defendant was playing the role that the victim C(37 years of age) used the corrected tape in the Defendant’s mind while drawing up a rebuttal in Daegu prison B located in the Seowon-Eup, Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun.

The Defendant sent the above lives to the victim “C~C”, and the victim took the hives of the Defendant, “I am h or C”, and the victim took the hives of the victim’s hives of “I am h or C,” and took the hives of the victim’s left part of the hives, thereby causing an injury to the victim at least two weeks of the hives of the hives of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Bobridge photographs;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Previous convictions: Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to inquire results, investigation reports (Attachment to the judgment, etc. of a case for which judgment has become final and conclusive), advance rulings on disposition, and report on results of confirmation;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 (1) of the Election of Imprisonment or Imprisonment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The sentence of sentencing under Article 48(1) of the Confiscation Criminal Act is to be imposed in light of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case again in a prison during the judgment of detention for the same crime, the method of injury, the degree of injury, and the fact that the victim did not have agreed to do so, but confession and reflect, the victim is not subject to punishment, the victim is not subject to punishment, and the case is subject to punishment at the same time as before the final judgment, the sentence is to be determined as ordered in consideration of equity