However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On March 29, 2016, at around 13:30, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim E (the 54 years of age) who was a company partner E and his/her monet and his/her monet, which was a dangerous object, on the one-time basis, on the part of his/her moneter, resulting in the Defendant’s flag, such as scambling, scambling, and scke, which require approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. The application of the Act and subordinate statutes, such as a medical certificate of injury, one medical record (a part and degree of the injury the victim suffered after the occurrence of the instant case, the Defendant was holding a monm spathner at the time, and was flaging the victim, etc., may be sufficiently recognized by the Defendant’s shoulderer at the time of the instant medical record as stated in its reasoning).

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, the type, degree and risk of the instant crime, the defendant's criminal punishment (at least 20 years old, but not within the last 20 years), some of the crimes are recognized, and are against themselves, and the degree of injury to the victim is not much serious, contingent crimes, and other various circumstances shown in the trial of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and details of the crime, shall be determined as ordered.