2. In light of the fact that the defendant was aware of and against the crime, and that there was no record of criminal punishment other than the punishment sentenced once for the violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2003, the crime of this case is strictly punished in that the defendant was paid compensation and lent means of access in light of the background, method and contents of the crime, etc., the crime of this case is not good in light of the crime, and the crime of this case can be a means of various criminal acts as well as the security and reliability of financial transaction. Considering the fact that the means of access actually transferred to the defendant was used for another crime, and all other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition