beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.06.14 2017고단651

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 19, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Ulsan District Court on September 24, 2014, and the execution of the sentence was terminated in the lawsuit against North Korean Dos on September 24, 2014. On February 17, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for the same crime in the same court and became final and conclusive on the same day.

1. On August 6, 2016, the Defendant invadedd a structure: (a) opened a door to the victim C’s “D” second floor of the Victim C management in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; and (b) opened a door to the victim’s cresh that is not within the law, and entered the door to steals money.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd on the building managed by the damaged person.

2. On January 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 15:35, and around 103-9, the Ulsan detention center located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do, Ulsan-gun; (b) the Defendant was requested by the teachers affiliated with the Ulsan-do detention center to remove valuables from Australia money; (c) he was out of her suffering; and (d) he was asked by the teachers affiliated with the Ulsan-do detention center to take out the valuables; and (e) he was asked by the teachers affiliated with the Ulsan-do detention center to take out the valuables again from the teachers F of the said detention center; and (e) he was asked by the F of the F of the F of the said house to take out the valuables again.

In order to prevent the Defendant’s failure, the teacher G in the same detention house put the Defendant’s hand in order to put the Defendant’s hand, she saw that “I am son,” and she saw “I am son,” and saw G’s hand, etc. as a saw, he saw G to put about about 10m of her hand into a saw with a saw.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted correctional public officials and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the management of prisoners of correctional officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement in relation to G, F, H, and E;

1. Each service report and documentary evidence;

1. C’s statement;

1. Report of investigation (specific suspect);

1. Previous convictions: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports (Attachment to such previous decisions and the period of repeated crimes at present.