However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 23, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on May 31, 2014 at the Government District Court for the violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act, which became final and conclusive on May 31, 2014.

No person of "2014 Highest 1738" shall take, inhale, or possess for this purpose any hazardous chemical substance prescribed by Presidential Decree that causes entertainment, halluation, or anesthesia.

Nevertheless, around 13:30 on May 30, 2014, the Defendant injected a “tobroke” industrial key part of the “tobroke” containing hallucinogenic substance in the front of the DY, which is located in Speaker C, into a fake paper, and inhaled it by means of a large string at the entrance of the given plastic paper.

Accordingly, the defendant inhaled hallucinogenic substances.

around 10:25 on May 29, 2014, the Defendant inhaled toxic chemicals by inserting some of 150g of the industrial “tourcoke” 150g of the “tourcoke,” which had been kept in his/her house, into a vinyl, in a manner of pulmononing and pulmononing them into a vinyl. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 25201, May 29, 201>

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Prosecutions and police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Protocol of seizure and on-site photographs of each police;

1. Each written request for appraisal;

1. Previous convictions: References to criminal records and investigation reports (Attachment of related cases) and the application of statutes;

1. Article 58 of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act and Articles 58 (3) and 43 (1) of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of punishment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. According to Article 62(1)(i) of the Criminal Act, this case is one of the results that the number of concurrent crimes in relation to Article 37 of the Criminal Act was prosecuted before and after, and tried in separate proceedings.