사기
A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months for a crime set forth in the judgment of the defendant 1, and by imprisonment for 2 months for a crime set forth in the judgment.
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Records] On August 29, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the purpose of fraud at the Cheongju District Court on August 29, 2014
9.6 The judgment became final and conclusive.
"2015 Highest 3835"
1. The Defendant is a person who has served as a branch office of the Daejeon Daejeon Branch Office (State) in Seo-gu, Daejeon.
The Defendant, at the office of the Daejeon Daejeon Branch on July 2013, 2013, ordered the victim D to undertake the construction of Daegu Etel at the time of the instant construction site, where the land owner known in the inside of the Republic of Korea, and KRW 60,000,000,000,000,000,000 won at the time of the instant construction site.
“A false statement” was made.
In fact, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to make a shower shower construction work at the said new construction site.
On August 9, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received from the victim, the total sum of KRW 30 million from the Defendant’s Cit Bank account (F) to the Defendant’s Korea Cit Bank account (F) on August 9, 2013, and KRW 30 million to the same account on the 16th day of the same month, and acquired it by deception.
"2017 Highest 5809"
2. The Defendant is a person operating a reconstruction implementing company called “G”.
On May 2015, the Defendant: (a) had experienced difficulties in selecting a new construction project of an apartment at the “J office (State)” office operated by the victim I in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; and (b) had been appointed as the head of the headquarters, etc. of the previous large construction company.
A construction project of this scale may be sufficiently selected through its neighboring connection.
“For the purposes of this section,”
6.2. The Defendant called the victim at an indic place and called “On the part of K to participate in the project, the head of the headquarters, etc., provided that the drinking value was paid as soon as possible to the owner of the drinking house business, but the transfer of KRW 7 million was changed.”
However, the defendant did not have entered into a promise or contract with K on the selection of the contractor, and he used 7 million won as entertainment expenses for the company's officers.