beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.04.28 2014고합106

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 17, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Seoul Central District Court, and on April 1, 201, the Incheon District Court sentenced three years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) and completed the execution of the sentence on January 1, 201, and was 6 times more previous and previous.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 2, 2014, between 14:00 and 16:00 on February 2, 2014, the Defendant left the victim C’s household room in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, thereby leaving the victim’s cellular phone equipment at the rate of 5.90,00 won, which is the victim’s market price.

In addition, from around that time to February 19:00 to around February 19, 2014, the Defendant habitually stolen property worth KRW 3770,000,000 in total five times by inserting damages into the victim’s bank or the outer organ, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table.

As a result, the defendant was sentenced to two or more penalties for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and habitually stolen another's property within three years after the execution is completed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, C, and F;

1. A copy of the G Planning;

1. On-site reports (CCTV analysis and mobile routes, Nos. 7), CCTV image data, and data from the openings (Evidence List Nos. 8);

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Photographs and photographs of seized articles (Evidence Nos. 16);

1. Records before judgment: Criminal records, and other inquiry reports and investigation reports (reports on the suspect's same kind of power and investigation records and confirmation of confinement);

1. Habituality of the judgment: The defendant has several criminal records of the same kind, including the criminal records of the thief in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and the defendant has committed each of the thief in this case again at least one month after the execution of the final sentence, and the number of the crimes and the method of the thief in light of the law.