A. The sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant led to the crime and agreed with the victims are favorable circumstances.

On the other hand, it is unfavorable that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime due to violent crimes, such as taking the victim of bodily injury, etc. in the presence of police, and the attitude and quality of the instant crime, including punishment, has been punished several times as violent crimes, and committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime.

Considering such circumstances as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, it cannot be said that the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or is unreasonable due to the absence of such circumstances.

All the arguments of the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.