A. Defendant B, among the real estate listed in attached Tables 1 and 2, indicated in attached Tables 2, 3, 4, 9, and 2.

A. On October 17, 2000, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Plaintiff on November 28, 200 with respect to the land size of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D large 21.2 square meters.

B. On November 28, 2000, Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu D major 21.2 square meters was divided into 10.4 square meters in the Gu E-gi, such as 10.8 square meters in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu D major 10.8 square meters, and the Jongno-gu Seoul D major 10.8 square meters in the attached list was divided into 1 and 2 land (hereinafter “instant land”) in the attached list on February 18, 2009.

C. A part of the G-owned buildings adjacent to the land Nos. 1 and 2 of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, on which part of the G-owned buildings owned by the Plaintiff was invaded on the instant land Nos. 1 and 2, and the part on the ship connected with each point of 0.8 square meters in sequence among the land Nos. 1 and 2 of this case (hereinafter “the part on the instant crime No. 1”) and 9, 4, 5, 11, 10, and 9 of the Map No. 2, and the part on the part (D-1) 1.4 square meters in the ship (hereinafter “the part on the instant crime No. 2”) connected each point of 6, 7, 10, 11, and 6 of the attached drawing No. 2 among the real estate No. 1 of this case and the real estate No. 2 of this case (hereinafter “the part on the instant crime”) in sequence connected each point of 6, 7, 10, and 6.

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against G and G, the owner of the building that intrudes on the instant land Nos. 1 and 2, and filed a lawsuit against H, who leased the part of the instant land No. 1, the Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court 201Gadan438480, and filed a lawsuit against G, etc., and the said court “G to the Plaintiff” removed the instant building Nos. 1, 2, and 2, 2, and 3 square meters of the roof structure of the block structure on the ground of land No. 1, 2, and 3, delivered each of the said sites, and Defendant H was handed down (hereinafter “previous judgment”). The said judgment became final and conclusive.

After the judgment of this case, Defendant B leased the part regarding the first and second crimes in this case from G, and Defendant C committed the third crimes in this case from G.