강제추행등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the prosecutor’s grounds of appeal (e.g., in a case where the defendant committed an indecent act by the victim C up to female toilets and assaulted the victim D’s face to assist the victim C at several times, and the victim is punished by the defendant. In light of the above, the court below’s sentence imposing an order to attend a sexual assault treatment course for 5 months, 2 years of suspended execution, and 20 hours is too uneasible.
2. In light of the facts alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable, considering all the circumstances alleged in the grounds of appeal, given that there is no record of criminal punishment, and there is no history of criminal punishment, and considering the motive and background of each of the instant crimes, the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, the degree of damage, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are conditions for sentencing, such as the character and conduct of the Defendant and the environment.
3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.