except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On December 29, 2019, at around 23:45, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender and sent to police officers in the D District Police Station B office at Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; (b) had the police officers under the investigation into a flagrant offender at the D District Police Station B office B office at Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; (c) had the police officers under the influence of alcohol so that he would cause tobacco to change; and (d) had the police officers under the duty to go through the investigation; (c) had the computer monitors, printers, and wave on the front of the Aginite seat; and (d) had all electric wires supplied, make it temporarily difficult for the Defendant to operate the computer without any electric cable supplied; and (d) had the wave cut off.

Accordingly, the defendant has harmed the utility of goods used by public offices.

2. The Defendant, at the time and time indicated in the above paragraph (1), takes a bath in a large sense at the detention room of the Sungnam Revision Police Station, and takes a different voice for tobacco.

The police officer, who is a police officer belonging to the above police station, was at one time at the right end of E, with the hand hand of the police officer at the port.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the detention of the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. The police statement of the defendant E in his court statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation into site photographs ( obtaining CCTVs in the office of a criminal team);

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of obstruction of performance of official duties on the grounds of sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is a serious crime that undermines the function of the State by nullifying a legitimate exercise of public authority, and thus requires strict punishment, and the defendant also committed the crime of damage to public goods by taking monitors, etc. inside the police station in the state of his taking, and the defendant committed the crime of damage to public goods.