교통사고처리특례법위반
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months;
2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Bsch Rexroth vehicles.
On October 10, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 08:40 on October 10, 2013, and proceeded with the front road of the Cheongcheon-ri station, which is in the process of transmitting the actual phase of Kimhae-si.
In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to confirm cross-road signals and to prevent accidents by driving along signals.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the Dice Motor Vehicle driven by the injured party C(59 years of age) who had driven at normal times according to the straight signal in a part facing the fault that violated the stop signal, and received the front part of the Dice Motor Vehicle from the right side of the above Switzerland Motor Vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim C, such as 1 and 3 chest pressure pressure, which requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim E (55 years of age) who was accompanied by the spack car, which requires approximately 10 weeks of medical treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement to C by the police;
1. A traffic accident report, a traffic accident report, and a photograph of the accident site;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;
1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;
2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.
3. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;
4. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the recognition of and rebuttals, the fact that an automobile comprehensive insurance was subscribed, the victims have agreed to do so, and the fact that there was no criminal conviction exceeding the fine);