Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

On July 16, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Southern Prison on September 9, 2014.

On April 12, 2015, at the D convenience store located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon on April 14:30, 2015, the Defendant is placed immediately in the front loan to the victim E who is part-time in that place.

The key of the sub-gate is broken and the key is repaired, and the repairing cost is changed in cash.

It would be right to lend KRW 200,000 to the repair cost.

As the term “F and G” was read, the mergial paper stating “F and G” was dry.

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the money even if the money was paid by the victim because the defendant was planned to use the money as a cost of living. However, the name and contact of the victim was all false, and the key was not able to live in front of the loan or the key was not broken.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim and receiving KRW 200,000 from the victim, and acquired it by fraud. From around that time to November 5, 2016, the Defendant acquired a total of KRW 8,496,000 through 47 times, such as the statement in the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, I, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, T, E, or U;

1. Each written statement of H, V, W, X, Y, M,O, Z, AB, AC, AD, AE, AE, AF, AH, AI, AJ, AK, AL, AM, AO, AO, AP, and Q;

1. AR's main text of business;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Each report on the occurrence of a crime, and each report on the occurrence of a crime committed against fraud;

1. Each internal investigation report, internal investigation report, internal investigation report (the phone call of the victim), internal investigation report, report on internal investigation (the phone call of the victim), report on internal investigation (the result of analysis of the proviso to the case regarding the mobile phone number of the suspect), report on internal investigation (the result of analysis of the proviso to the mobile phone number of the suspect), report on internal investigation (the investigation of the other party to the mobile phone name of the mobile phone), internal investigation (the victim against the victim), and report on internal investigation (the victim AL).