사기
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
The application for compensation of this case is dismissed.
1. On July 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) transferred the ownership of the victim G’s land located in the Busan High-gu Busan High-gu, Busan High-gu (hereinafter “Ito”), the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that he would build a warehouse (hereinafter “the warehouse of this case”) on the land of another land owner, which is a new warehouse (hereinafter “the warehouse of this case”) by setting the amount of the purchase price of the above land at KRW 45 million; and (b) setting the amount of the purchase price of the above land at KRW 50 million to KRW 50 million; and (c) setting the lessee’s deposit amount at KRW 50 million and KRW 165 million as KRW 165 million on the land of the JJ by the end of September 2013.
However, even if the ownership of the above I land is transferred, the defendant was given a loan as collateral and tried to use the I's loan construction cost on the I's land as collateral, and there was no fund to construct a warehouse on the J's land equivalent to 60 million won due to bad credit holders at the time, and there was no intention or ability to construct a warehouse on the J's land by the end of September 2013.
On August 19, 2013, the Defendant transferred the ownership of the said I land in the name of K, the Defendant’s wife, at the market price of KRW 165 million.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
2. In full view of the following circumstances duly admitted and examined by the court, the evidence alone presented by the prosecutor was proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt as to the facts charged.
It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
A. On July 15, 2013, the victim and the Defendant purchased I’s land from the injured party in KRW 405,000,000, and the contract deposit amount of KRW 50,000,000, banking debt of KRW 190,000 is accepted by the Defendant, and the remainder of KRW 165,00,000 is substituted by the Defendant’s new construction of the warehouse of this case (hereinafter “Agreement”).