beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.11.05 2017고단2222

사기

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for one year, for Defendant B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed the Defendants’ joint crime, as the representative director D’s Defendant A, promoted a project to develop another canal voucher in 10 parcels, including Y, the land owner was unable to obtain permission from the land owner, and not only did it receive a loan from a financial institution, but also did not obtain a loan from an investor, and even if he borrowed money from the victim F, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the borrowed money from the damaged party by carrying out the said canal voucher development project. Defendant B was well aware of this fact as Defendant A’s spouse.

The Defendants gathered to receive money from the victim F to receive money from the victim F by borrowing a canal well development project, and Defendant B is expected to complete the project on October 19, 2015 with the victim in the office located in the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City.

There is also a person who will invest KRW 300 million in the bank and there is also a loan of KRW 50 billion in the bank.

It shall be repaid without any mold until the end of the year from which the expenses are insufficient to lend the money.

“A false statement,” and its affiliation received 50 million won from the injured party to the corporate bank bank account in the name of Defendant A as a loan, and received a total of 3.5 million won from around that time to April 10, 2016, including a total of 12 times, as indicated in the list of crimes, from around that time.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to obtain a total of 350 million won from the injured party.

2. Defendant B’s sole criminal act did not have any special property or income, and as a result, Defendant A’s other canal system development project, the husband, was in short of funds, and even if he/she got out of the total amount of KRW 10 million on December 2, 2015, he/she was planned to use it as business expenses and did not have any intent or ability to repay the said amount even if he/she borrowed money from the said victim.

A. On September 10, 2015, the Defendant was guilty of fraud.