However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 1, 2018, the Defendant received a proposal to increase the credit rating by raising the details of transactions from a person who is not the name of the financial organization, and then notified the Saemaul Treasury Account Number (C) in the name of the Defendant.

On January 23, 2018, when receiving money from the victim D, victim E, or victim F on or around January 23, 2018, the name-oriented beneficiary calls to the victims without the intent or ability to provide a loan, and will provide a loan to the said victims as an employee of a financial company, and a loan will be made at a low interest rate.

A false statement was made to the effect that “the remittance of money to an account known” was “the remittance of money.”

At around 11:57 on the same day, the person who was unable to name was transferred KRW 5.2 million to the above account from the victim D, and the defendant was sent to G, a book-keeping, who was waiting in the nearby area after withdrawing the above KRW 5.2 million, in accordance with the direction of a person who was in the name of a person who was aware of the fact that the above amount could be a prohibited damage to financial fraud in the Seocho-gu, Gwangju, 12:13 on the same day.

At around 13:55 on the same day, the person who was unable to use his name was transferred KRW 3 million to the above account from the victim E, and the defendant, around 15:08 on the same day, withdrawn the above KRW 3 million from the above Saemaeul Credit Cooperatives around 15:08 on the same day, and found him to the above G in the above way.

At around 15:34 on the same day, the person in whose name the victim was not injured was remitted to the above account from the victim F, and the defendant tried to withdraw the above KRW 13 million from the Saemaul F depository around 16:00 on the same day, but the police officer who received the report failed to dispatch and withdraw it.

Accordingly, the Defendant, even though he was aware of the fact that he was committing a financial fraud, was able to easily commit the fraud of a person who was unable to obtain his name, by doing so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Prosecutions against the Defendant.