However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around May 2, 2013, the Defendant operated the “F”, which is a wholesale office of goods in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, and made a false statement to the effect that “F will approve the last day of each month of each month, while wholesale goods are sold on credit.”

However, at that time, the Defendant had a large debt, and F has already discontinued on April 27, 2012, and it was thought that F would have been used to repay the debt after being supplied with the goods by the victim, so there was no intention or ability to pay the price for the goods to the victim as the promise was made.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim on May 2, 2013, acquired goods, such as 3,053,50 won from the victim, 3,941,90 won around May 3, 2013, and 17,334,000 won around May 8, 2013, and 23,112,00 won around May 18, 2013, and 23,112,00 won around May 24, 2013, and acquired goods, such as 49,367,400 won, and fumba, from the victim on five occasions. < Amended by Act No. 11845, May 2, 2013; Act No. 1187, May 26, 2013>

"2014 Highest 25"

1. On August 8, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim I to the effect that, “The Defendant would deliver 1,570 won per piece of land for environment-friendly laundry to 1k and 900 won per unit of land for environment-friendly general laundry, 4,000 and 6,000 won of land for general laundry to receive if he wishes to receive 1,1680 won of the total goods price, and then deliver 1,570 won per unit of land for environment-friendly laundry to 1,570 won per unit of land for environment-friendly laundry, which is the place for receipt by August 16, 2013.”

그러나 피고인은 피해자에게 납품할 물건을 갖고 있지 않았고, 피해자에게 납품을 하기 위해 구매하려고 한 물품의 가격이 피고인에게 납품을 하기로 한 가격보다 비쌌기 때문에...