When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Although the defendant participated in the net court container auction, he was not awarded a successful bid, and the wife of the victim B was awarded a successful bid for the above container.

At around 13:30 on March 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) failed to be awarded a bid for the instant case; (b) on the ground that the Defendant rejected the Defendant’s refusal of the instant judgment, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s head on one occasion by assaulting the victim’s left knee on one occasion by using the victim’s knee in one and the left hand; and (c) destroyed the victim’s knee in the Samsung Galtho Trith 3 mobile phone in an amount equivalent to KRW 1170,000,000 at the market price owned by the victim on a usual basis.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning B and D;

1. Investigation report (Investigation of the counter party of the shootings);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 266 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;