(2) The Defendant’s crime of this case, among the grounds for appeal, appears to have been withdrawn on the first day of the trial of the first instance on the date of the trial of the first instance on the grounds of mistake of facts. 2. The Defendant’s crime of this case, after preparing a false lease contract, provided it as a security, obtained a loan of KRW 114 million from the victim bank, and acquired it as a result of which the nature of the crime is very poor, and the amount of the crime is not so much poor, and the damage recovery cannot be seen to have been made up up until now, comprehensively considering various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character, conduct, occupation

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.