Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is currently serving in a divorce lawsuit between the victim B (n, 42 years of age) and the married couple.

1. From around 08:00 on May 19, 2018 to at least 09:00, the Defendant destroyed the repair cost so that the repair cost is KRW 20,000,00,000, by putting the victim’s E-car volume, which is parked in the said parking lot, into the rear wheels of the victim’s E-car volume, and making the vehicle move by leaving approximately KRW 20,000,000 in length, from the latter part of the vehicle parked in the said parking lot to the latter end of the vehicle.

2. From around 08:00 on July 14, 2018 to around 09:00, the Defendant destroyed fishing to ensure that the amount equivalent to KRW 20,000 of the repair cost is equal to the same reason and in the same manner at the same place as described in the foregoing paragraph (1).

3. From around 08:00 to around 09:0 on August 4, 2018, the Defendant destroyed a string that the amount equivalent to KRW 20,00 of the repair cost would be equal to the same reason and at the same place as described in the foregoing paragraph (1).

4. From around 08:00 on August 11, 2018 to around 09:00, the Defendant destroyed fishing to ensure that the amount equivalent to KRW 20,000 of the repair cost is equal to the same reasoning and in the same manner at the same place as described in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation (Attachment of photographs on the damage and destruction of property by vehicles), a report on internal investigation (Attachment of a written estimate for the damage) and a report on investigation (with regard to the details of the receipt of the damage

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, repeated several times the crimes under the same law, and did not recover the damage to the victim until now.

However, the defendant shows his attitude to recognize and reflect his mistake, and there is no particular criminal offense against the defendant.

The amount of repair cost.