On February 7, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in Busan District Court's Dong Branch branch branch court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 7, 2018.

1. On June 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) stated the title “written confirmation” using a tample in the paper, without the consent of the AU, at the Defendant’s residence located in the Busan Shipping Daegu of Busan, with the intention of submitting it as evidentiary materials of the lawsuit seeking temporary injunction against access to C; and (b) carried out the title “written confirmation” in the front of the AU on May 6, 2017, with the intention of submitting it as evidentiary materials of the lawsuit seeking a temporary injunction against access to C; and (c) carried the tample A, which is immediately attached to the vehicle at the time of moving the house at the time of moving the house at the time of moving the house at the port, and later carried out the tamp AX si on the front of the 112 police station prior to the AY kindergarten in the middle; and (d) stated “AbA team leader AU”.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of confirmation in the name of AU, which is a private document concerning a certificate of fact.

2. On June 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) submitted to the Busan District Court Branch Branch Branch of the Busan District Court located in 20 Doo-ro 112, Busan District Court; (b) as the document duly formed, a forged confirmation document was submitted to the above court employees who knew of the forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of a witness AU;

1. Each police statement made to BB and C;

1. A certificate;

1. Although the Defendant prepared and used a written confirmation of the name of the AU, the Defendant asserts that this was made with the presumption of consent of the AU.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, AU first becomes aware of the defendant's director around May 6, 2017 as the team leader of the company involved in this article, there is no friendly relationship between the defendant and AU, and AU has no friendly relationship between the defendant and AU, and the defendant has no friendly relationship.