2...

On July 16, 2016, the Defendant conducted the first test of assistant housing managers on July 19, 2016 (hereinafter “instant test”).

The examination of this case presents five deemed claims and selects one of them as the most appropriate answer, and is made by putting them on the OCR card. It consists of three subjects of civil law, accounting principles, and theory of the opening of multi-family housing facilities, and 120 questions in total per 40 questions.

Criteria for passing the examination of this case are at least 40 points out of 100 for each subject, and at least average of 60 points for all subjects.

Of the instant examination, the issue No. A type 113 (B type 108) of the subject of the opening of multi-family housing facilities (hereinafter referred to as the “instant issue”) is as follows. The Defendant’s answer to the said problem is as follows: “(1) An electric safety device is mainly used for the exchange elevator; however, the Plaintiffs are not correct due to an explanation on the elevator. (2) An automatic stop of an elevator from the highest floor and lower floor on which the elevator is operated. (3) An electrical safety device belongs to the electric safety device. (5) An electric device belongs to the mechanical safety device of an elevator. (3) An automatic stop of an elevator.”

In the instant examination, the Plaintiff A scores a total of 177.5 points in the Civil Code, 50 points in the accounting principle, 70 points in the opening of multi-family housing facilities, 177.5 points in the Civil Code, 59.16 points in the total of 17.5 points in the accounting principle, 65 points in the opening of multi-family housing facilities, and 177.5 points in the total of 65 points in the opening of multi-family housing facilities, and 59.16 points in the average of 60 points in the examination of this case. On August 17, 2016, the Defendant (hereinafter “instant disposition”).