However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On May 5, 2016, the Defendant sent a text message to the victim C, who reported the above advertising around May 16, 2016, stating that “First, on the deposit of the price of goods, the Defendant will send goods as of the next day of the payment of the price of goods to the door-to-door dispatch of goods on the Internet Nene Qccifine 600,000 won on the website of the Internet Nene Qcifine 1 at the PC located near the operation station of the subway of 73 Incheon subway, Incheon.”

However, as the defendant had already sold one of the above medium-to-door Qucom mixing to another, the defendant had no intention or ability to send the above goods to door-to-door distribution even if he received deposit from the victim.

On May 18, 2016, the Defendant received KRW 600,000 from the victim’s bank account in the name of the Defendant on May 18, 2016, using the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number D) in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On June 3, 2016, around June 2, 2016, the Defendant sent a text message to the victim E, who reported the above advertisement on the same day, stating that “First, the Defendant would send goods to door on June 4, 2016, at the time of deposit of the price of goods, by June 4, 2016, on the Internet NAVS3 smartphone’s website at the PC located near the operation station of the subway 1, 73 Incheon subway.”

However, as the defendant has already sold one of the above gallon lusium juS3 smartphone to another, even if he has received the deposit from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above goods as a selective distribution.

On June 3, 2016, the Defendant received KRW 100,000 from the victim by account transfer from the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number D) in the name of the Defendant on June 3, 2016.

This is the defendant.