However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant and the victim B (the age of 58) met with the introduction of a branch person around August 2016, and lived for about two years from May 2017 to around the defendant's residence located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul, but due to the difference of character such as the defendant's injection, etc., the victim is currently living in the deaf-gu owned by the victim of the Gyeonggi-do, and the victim is currently living in the deaf-do.

1. Damage to property;

A. A. On July 1, 2018, around 10:00 on July 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim would not live together on the ground of the Defendant’s injection in front of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul E market; (b) and (c) destroyed the Ftero vehicles, the victim was parked on the road, to have four knife knife in a knife, the knife of which is 800,000 won at the market price.

B. Around June 23, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime, around 15:00 on June 23, 2019, committed the crime, and around June 23, 2019, committed the crime with a view to suggesting the victim to live together again in the above farming shed, but on the ground that the victim’s market price, which was the victim’s possession, was located there, did not enter, thereby impairing its utility, such as dumping the clothes, fungs, and fungs, etc. into the ditches outside the farming shed, or fungsing the water.

C. On June 30, 2019, around 11:00 on June 30, 2019, the Defendant: (a) sought the victim from the above farmer; (b) however, on the ground that the victim did not move, the Defendant destroyed by cutting 50,000 won of the market price, which was 50,000 won, which was the victim’s possession in front of the farmland shed, in front of the farmland shed.

2. On June 2019, the Defendant: (a) demanded the victim to pay consolation money under the name of consolation money; (b) but the victim refused to do so; (c) had the victim used the fact that the warehouse owned by the victim was an illegal building and had the victim receive money.

On June 23, 2019, the Defendant: “Around 07:54, the Defendant, at an irregular place, refers to a cocondemy, after filing a civil petition, and allowing the victim to leave the warehouse.”