When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On July 2010, the Defendant: (a) did not have succeeded to his claim from the victim B; (b) in order to obtain a decision to grant the succession execution of the claim by using the original copy of the conciliation protocol drawn up by the victim; (c) in the office of the D Judicial Scriveners Office located in the Young-gu, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (d) had the victim obtain consent as if he had a legitimate authority; and (d) had a certified judicial scrivener employee who believed it to be true prepare one copy of “the notice of the transfer of the claim, which is a document necessary for the issuance of the written decision on the succession of the claim; and (e) signed one copy of “the notice of the transfer of the claim” and affixed a seal with the victim’

In this respect, the defendant set up one copy of the "Notice of Transfer of Claim" under the name of the victim, and one copy of the "Contract of Transfer of Claim".

2. On July 5, 2010, the defendant at the event of the above investigation documents, etc. submitted one copy of the "Notice of Transfer of Claim under the name of the victim" and one copy of the "Contract of Transfer of Claim" within the civil petition office of the Suwon-si District Court of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which is a civil petition office of Paragraph 1.

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A complaint (as recognized by each evidence of the judgment below, only the injured party only provided the original conciliation protocol to the defendant, and did not deliver power of attorney, seal imprint certificate, and seal imprint to the defendant, and there was no agreement between the injured party and the injured party to explicitly transfer and take over the claims when the conciliation protocol was submitted from the injured party. If the injured party permitted the obligor to collect the claims from the obligor E in the form of acquiring the claims by transfer of the claims, the Defendant did not explicitly prepare a contract for transferring the claims, and the Defendant did not have any reason to do so, and the injured party also knew that it was permitted by the injured party.