beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.13 2013가합67414

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Party’s position 1) The Network D is a Dol University Seoul National University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) located in 222 according to the distribution of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

(2) The Defendant is the operator of the Defendant hospital and the employer of the medical staff of the Defendant hospital. The Plaintiff is the husband of the D, the Plaintiff B, and C. The Defendant is the medical staff of the Defendant hospital.

B. The content 1 of the medical treatment at the Defendant Hospital up to December 14, 2009 ) D around 2002 Da is a telegraphic red sule lusium in the Matis of the Defendant Hospital (hereinafter “Malus”).

) 등으로 진단받은 후 꾸준히 약물치료를 받아왔는데, 2009. 10. 21.부터 2009. 11. 2.까지 루푸스 질병활성도 증가로 피고 병원에 입원하였고, 당시 호중구 감소증으로 격리병실에 입실하여 고용량 스테로이드 치료를 받았다. 2) 피고 병원이 2009. 12. 14. D에 대하여 시행한 내과검사결과, 자가면역혈청 및 면역화학검사상 항DNA 항체(anti ds-DNA Ab) : > 800IU/㎖(정상수치 : 100이하), 보체3(C3) : 33mg/dl(정상수치 : 76mg/dl ~ 139mg/dl), 보체4(C4) : 10.9mg/dl(정상수치 : 12mg/dl ~ 37mg/dl), 소변검사상 잠혈과 단백질 있음, 백혈구 : 고배율상 100개 이상(정상수치 : 0 ~ 3개), 적혈구 : 고배율상 4 ~ 9개(정상수치 : 0 ~ 1개), 세균 : 고배율상 많음으로, 일반혈액검사상 백혈구수 2,630개/㎕로 각 확인되었다.

C. On December 15, 2009, D applied to the radioactive field outside the area of the Defendant hospital to the address and received medical treatment from E medical specialist belonging to the Defendant hospital. F decided whether to conduct a collaboration with internal medicine and MRI inspection and whether to conduct a surgery. 2) D was subject to an MO inspection at the Defendant hospital on January 4, 2010.

3 On January 5, 2010, D returned to the Defendant Hospital in the main lake and marsh for pain. On January 5, 2010, D returned to the Defendant Hospital. On January 5, 2010, the 3-4-5 vertebrates and sediment of the results of the MFI reported on January 10:03, 201.